Donahue

Donahue v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20253:21-cv-00448California5,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JUSTIN DONAHUE, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00448-MMC

Plaintiffs, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD Re: Dkt. No.

COMPANY,

14 Defendant. 15 Before the Court is defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“Union Pacific”) “Motion for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 60), filed August 5, 2022. Plaintiffs Justin Donahue ("Donahue"), Jason Campbell ("Campbell"), and Jacob Goss ("Goss") have filed opposition, to which Union Pacific has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion and having considered the arguments made at hearing, the Court rules as follows. 22 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are three former conductors1 for Union Pacific (see Rhoten Decl. Ex. B (Goss), Ex. C (Campbell), Ex. D (Donahue)) whose positions “entailed reading and interpreting multicolored railroad traffic signal lights on signal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.