De'Anthony Tyquan Govan v. Fidencio N. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20252:24-cv-10059California1,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-10059 MRA (MBK) Date May 13, 2025 Title De’Anthony Tyquan Govan v. Fidencio N. Guzman, Acting Warden of CSP-Centinela

Present: The Honorable Michael B. Kaufman, United States Magistrate Judge James Muñoz n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: none none

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THIS ACTION

BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THE PETITION CONTAINS AN

UNEXHAUSTED CLAIM

On November 20, 2024, Petitioner De’Anthony Tyquan Govan (“Petitioner”), represented by counsel, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). Dkt. 1. After the Court ordered Respondent to respond to the Petition, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition (“Motion”) on January 15, 2025. Dkt. 8. Respondent also lodged documents pertaining to Petitioner’s state court proceedings. Dkt. 9. On March 5, 2025, Petitioner filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opposition”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.