(PC) Hankins v. Avenal State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20251:23-cv-00720California705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA HANKINS, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00720-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO

AVENAL STATE PRISON, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Joshua Hankins is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. I. INTRODUCTION On April 11, 2025, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 12.) Specifically, the Court found Plaintiff’s complaint violated Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id. at 5-12.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the screening order. (Id. at 12- 13.) More particularly, Plaintiff was ordered to file a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days of the date of service of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.