Johal

(PC) Paschall v. Johal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20251:24-cv-00154California1,088 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMAR PASCHALL, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00154-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

NINETY DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO

v. IDENTIFY JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE

AMANDEEP JOHAL, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lamar Paschall is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a complaint on February 2, 2024. (Doc. 1.) Following screening, the Court found Plaintiff states cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Jane Doe and John Doe. (See Doc. 13.) The Court now addresses the need to identify Jane Doe and John Doe against whom the Eighth Amendment claims will proceed. II. DISCUSSION Defendants Jane Doe and John Doe are employed as registered nurses at the Sierra Conservation Center and are presently unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges Jane Doe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.