Tony Bobulinski v. Hugh Dickson

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ) TONY BOBULINSKI, ) Case No. 2:25-cv-02713 CV (AJRx) ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF ) TONY BOBULINSKI’S UNOPPOSED Plaintiff, ) MOTION FOR REMAND [DOC. # 21] ) v. ) HUGH DICKSON, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) 17 On May 2025, Plaintiff Tony Bobulinski (“Plaintiff”) filed an Unopposed Motion for Remand, Doc. # 21 (“Motion”). The Motion designated May 23, 2025, for a hearing of the Motion. See Id. On May 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Reply in support of the Motion. Doc. # 22. Plaintiff sought remand of this case based on evidence that at least one partner of Defendant Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP (“Sheppard Mulllin”) was an American citizen domiciled abroad, which has the effect of destroying diversity for the purposes of federal subject …