Ballard

Ballard v. Duran

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20255:25-cv-00955California326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENNETH RAY BALLARD, Case No. 25-cv-00955-NW

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

SAUL DURAN, et al., Defendants.

12 On January 30, 2025, Plaintiff Kenneth Ray Ballard filed the instant pro se civil rights action. ECF No. 1. After this matter was reassigned on February 13, 2025, correspondence mailed to Ballard was returned as undeliverable, and Ballard has still not provided the Court with his current address or made any contact with the Court in three months. ECF Nos. 6, 7. Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding without attorney representation (pro se) whose address changes while an action is pending must promptly file and serve upon all opposing parties a notice of change of address specifying the new address. Civ. L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint when: (1) mail directed to the pro se party by the court has been returned to the court as not deliverable, and (2) the court fails to receive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.