Ramos

(PC) Trammel v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20252:23-cv-01111California2,140 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMARION TRAMMEL, No. 2:23-cv-1111 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. RAMOS, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Currently, before the court is defendants’ motion to stay these proceedings pending the resolution of plaintiff’s criminal case. ECF No. 43. I. Plaintiff’s Allegations This case proceeds on the original complaint, which was screened and found to state cognizable claims against defendants Ramos, Ortiz-Zamora, and Ortiz-Garcia for violations of the Eight Amendment. ECF No. 14 at 3. Plaintiff alleges that Ramos, Ortiz-Zamora, and Ortiz- Garcia used excessive force against him during an incident on April 27, 2023, when they entered his cell and beat him with a baton and closed fists. ECF No. 1 at 2. II. Motion to Stay A. Motion Defendants seek a stay of these proceedings under the Pullman abstention doctrine,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.