(PC) Wilson v. High Desert State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20252:25-cv-00309California3,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER JOHN WILSON, No. 2:25-cv-0309 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and is proceeding in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. This case is before the Court to address plaintiff’s response to the order to show cause and to screen plaintiff’s first amended complaint. As set forth below, the pending order to show cause is discharged, and plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint. I. STATUS OF PLAINTIFF’S AMENDMENTS On February 28, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 11.) In the alternative, he could file an amended complaint raising only claims for which he exhausted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.