Lorigan

(PC) Hanka v. Lorigan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20252:25-cv-00564California255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN J. HANKA, No. 2:25-cv-0564 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MATHEW LORIGAN, et al., Defendants. 16 On March 28, 2025, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty-day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.