White

White v. Guardian Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202524-2681California741 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM WHITE, No. 24-2681

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01788-L-KSC v.

THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE MEMORANDUM*

COMPANY OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 21, 2025 San Diego, California

Before: WALLACE, MCKEOWN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges

Plaintiff-Appellant William White (“White”) appeals from the district court’s

(1) denial of his motion to establish de novo as the standard of review applicable to

Defendant-Appellee Guardian Life Insurance Company’s (“Guardian”) denial of his

insurance claim; and (2) summary judgment in favor of Guardian. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

White’s insurance claim arises…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.