Bondi
Vitorino Silva v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202524-1577California1,032 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GLEIDSON VITORINO No. 24-1577 SILVA; JULIANA MARCIA NEVES; C. Agency Nos.
E. C. N., A220-558-665
A220-758-581
Petitioners,
A220-758-582
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 12, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: BEA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.***
Petitioner Gleidson Vitorino Silva (“Silva”), his wife, Juliana Marcia Neves
(“Neves”), and Neves’s minor child (together “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by…