Almanza
United States v. Almanza
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2176 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cr-00212-FLA-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
FRANK LINK ALMANZA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 12, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Frank Link Almanza appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to
suppress evidence seized from his car, which he argues was obtained in violation
of the Fourth Amendment. We review the district court’s denial of the suppression
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motion de novo. United States v. Washington, 490 F.3d 765, 769 (9th Cir. 2007).