Almanza

United States v. Almanza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202523-2176California487 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2176 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cr-00212-FLA-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK LINK ALMANZA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 12, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Frank Link Almanza appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to

suppress evidence seized from his car, which he argues was obtained in violation

of the Fourth Amendment. We review the district court’s denial of the suppression

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motion de novo. United States v. Washington, 490 F.3d 765, 769 (9th Cir. 2007).

As the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.