Bondi
Penaloza Huato v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202523-2077California878 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 14 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GERMAN PENALOZA HUATO et al., No. 23-2077
Petitioner, Agency Nos.
A201-300-556
v. A201-300-557
A201-300-558
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 12, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, W. FLETCHER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner German Penaloza Huato (“Penaloza”), a native and citizen of
Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)
dismissal of his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for asylum and withholding of removal.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We deny the petition…