Bondi

Penaloza Huato v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202523-2077California878 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 14 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERMAN PENALOZA HUATO et al., No. 23-2077

Petitioner, Agency Nos.

A201-300-556

v. A201-300-557

A201-300-558

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 12, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, W. FLETCHER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner German Penaloza Huato (“Penaloza”), a native and citizen of

Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

dismissal of his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for asylum and withholding of removal.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We deny the petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.