Gunzenhauser

Gunzenhauser v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202524-2232California997 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL GUNZENHAUSER, No. 24-2232 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cv-03406-WHO

v. MEMORANDUM* PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 12, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BEA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.***

Appellant Michael Gunzenhauser appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). Gunzenhauser

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.