Alvarenga-Rodriguez

Alvarenga-Rodriguez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202523-2918California647 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 14 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETROCINIO ALVARENGA- No. 23-2918 RODRIGUEZ, Agency No. A088-721-732 Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 12, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, W. FLETCHER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Petrocinio Alvarenga-Rodriguez petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen. He moved

to reopen his proceedings to apply for cancellation of removal. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.

Cui v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.