Weissberg

Weissberg v. Peinado CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2025A170372California855 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smiley, J.

Filed 5/14/25 Weissberg v. Peinado CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STEPHEN WEISSBERG,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A170372 v. (San Francisco City & County

RENE PEINADO,

Super. Ct. No. CGC-99-304332) Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

This is the second of two appeals arising from an order directing the sale of Rene Peinado’s home to pay a money judgment owed to Stephen Weissberg. (Code Civ. Proc., § 704.760.) In the first appeal, we reversed the sale order. (Weissberg v. Peinado (Apr. 4, 2025, A169780) [nonpub. opn.] (Weissberg I).) We then advised the parties of our intent to dismiss as moot this second appeal, in which Weissberg challenges an order setting the amount of the bond Peinado filed to stay enforcement of the sale order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.