Rose
Rose v. Hobby Lobby Stores
Opinion
Opinion
Miller, J.
Filed 5/14/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
KELLY ROSE,
Plaintiff,
A169640
v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG17862127) Defendant and Respondent;
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS, DIVISION OF
LABOR STANDARDS
ENFORCEMENT,
Intervener and Appellant.
Plaintiff Kelly Rose, who had been employed by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (Hobby Lobby) as a cashier, sued her former employer under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq. (PAGA)) alleging Hobby Lobby had violated the “suitable seating” provisions of the applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order. After a nine- day bench trial, the court found for Hobby Lobby, and judgment was entered in its favor. In a separate appeal, we affirmed the judgment. (Rose v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (March 25, 2025, A168301) [nonpub. opn.].) The present appeal arises from the trial court’s award of nearly $125,000 in litigation costs as a matter of right to Hobby Lobby as the prevailing party under the general cost recovery rule set out in Code of Civil Procedure section…