Leon

Leon v. SSA Commissioner

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20251:22-cv-05373California1,440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL LEON,

CASE NO. 22-cv-5373-RMI Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. PETITION FOR 42 U.S.C. §406(b)

LELAND DUDEK, ATTORNEY FEES

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

9 Defendant

11 After Plaintiff Michael Leon brought this action for review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny benefits, the Court remanded the case, and the Commissioner issued a favorable decision. His attorney, Katherine Siegfried, now seeks $26,422.55 in attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ECF No. 29. For the following reasons, the court GRANTS the motion. I. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

After Mr. Leon applied for disability benefits, that application was denied initially, at 20 reconsideration, after an initial administrative hearing, and at the Appeals Council. AR 1. Mr. Leon 21 then brought this action for judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF No. 1. This court 22 found in Mr. Leon’s favor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.