Hedges

Hedges v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20253:24-cv-08354California755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CRAIG J. HEDGES, Case No. 24-cv-08354-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v. PURSUANT FED. R. CIV. P. 41(B)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Re: ECF 28 Defendants.

On May 7, 2025, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff’s complaint. ECF 28. The Court found that Plaintiff had (1) failed to properly serve Defendants, (2) failed to establish that the United States waived sovereign immunity, (3) failed to establish an exception to the Anti-Injunction Act and Declaratory Judgment Act, and (4) failed to state a claim. Id. at 4–8. The Court granted dismissal of all claims in the complaint. Id. at 9. The Court permitted Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by May 13, 2025, to address the deficiencies identified in the order. Id. “Plaintiff’s amended complaint must address the issue of sovereign immunity, the Anti-Injunction Act, and the Declaratory Judgment Act. Plaintiff must also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.