Acosta
Acosta v. Singh
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01437-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED1 JASWANT SINGH, individually and dba OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS
GRANT MARKET, RAJINDER KAUR,
individually and dba GRANT MARKET, (Doc. No. 10) Defendants. 15 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) filed April 21, 2025. (Doc. No. 10, “Motion”). Defendants have not answered or responded to the Complaint, nor have they filed any opposition or taken any actions in this case. The Court found the Motion suitable for disposition without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 230(g) and vacated the hearing scheduled for May 30, 2025. (Doc. No. 11). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment be granted. //// //// //// 27…