Leung

Leung v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20255:24-cv-00337California5,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHIRLEY JANE LEUNG, Case No. 24-cv-00337-NW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND

DENYING MOTION TO STAY

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE DISCOVERY AS MOOT CORPORATION, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 106, 108, 109, 110 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are motions to dismiss from the Federal Deposit Insurance Company acting in its capacity as receiver to SVB (“FDIC-R”), John Longley (“Longley”), and Greg W. Becker (“Becker”) and FDIC-R’s motion to stay discovery. ECF Nos. 106, 108, 109, 110. The Court DENIES Longley and Becker’s motions to dismiss, and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part FDIC-R’s motion to dismiss without leave to amend. Defendants’ motion to stay is denied as moot. I. BACKGROUND The Court previously summarized Plaintiff’s allegations in its prior order partially dismissing portions of Leung’s initial complaint with partial leave to amend. See Leung v. Fed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.