(HC) Hurtadodominguez v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20251:25-cv-00434California651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERGIO HURTADODOMINGUEZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-00434-JLT-CDB (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., (Docs. 1, 5) Respondents.

Sergio Hurtadodominguez, a state prisoner incarcerated at Avenal State Prison, proceeds pro se

and in forma pauperis with a filing labeled “ex parte quasi-sovereign writ of mandate” against Respondents United States of America, Immigration and Enforcement Customs and Donald Trump (collectively, “Respondents”), filed on April 14, 2025. (Doc. 1.) The Court construes the filing as a petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361 seeking a Court order that would require Respondents to deport Petitioner back to his birth country of origin pursuant to President Donald Trump’s executive order entitled “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” issued January 20, 2025 (the “Executive Order”)1.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.