Asman

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20252:20-cv-00195California2,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-0195 DJC CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ADAM ASMAN, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiffs Thomas Schmitz1 and Dianne Mallia proceed without counsel with civil rights claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is before the court for a further order on the motion for protective order filed by defendants Adams, Andaluz, Ashe, Asman, Branman, Brizendine, Brockenborough, Ceballos, Diaz, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. Johnson, Kernan, Ponciano, Ramkumar, Rekart, Robinson, Rudas, M. Smith, C. Smith, Tebrock, Toche, and Waine (“defendants”) as to a third-party subpoena issued by plaintiff Mallia to non-party Dr. Michael Golding. (ECF No. 323.) On February 16, 2024, the court granted in part and denied in part the motion for a protective order and ordered documents relevant to Request for Production No. 26, relating to communications sent or received by Dr. Golding, be submitted for in camera review. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.