Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20252:23-cv-02585California7,841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, No. 23-cv-02585-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., (Doc. No. 13) Defendant.

16 This matter is before the court on Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s (“UPS”) motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 13.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion was taken under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 14.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Samantha Williams filed this employment action in the Sacramento County Superior Court against Defendant UPS, her former employer, and Does 1–20 on August 14, 2023. (Doc. No. 1-1 at 2.) On November 8, 2023, Defendant removed this action to this court. (Doc. No. 1.) Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on November 15, 2023. (Doc. No. 3.) In lieu of filing an opposition to that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.