Sotoodeh

Sotoodeh v. City of South El-Monte

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202524-3848California1,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAMBOD SOTOODEH; STELLA No. 24-3848 SOTOODEH; 88 SWEET, INC., D.C. No. 2:23-cv-06883-MEMF-AS Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF SOUTH EL-MONTE, a municipal corporation; JOE MARTINEZ, South El Monte Code Enforcement Supervisor; VINH VO, City of South El Monte Code Enforcement Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON, LEE, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge R. NELSON.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). When the district court ordered the Sotoodeh family and their company…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.