Saldana-Velez

Saldana-Velez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202523-932California634 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO MANUEL SALDANA-VELEZ, No. 23-932 Agency No. Petitioner, A095-761-039 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ricardo Saldana-Velez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion

to remand to seek cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). The BIA

declined to remand because Petitioner had failed to make a prima facie showing that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). he would be eligible for cancellation of removal. See Fonseca-Fonseca v. Garland,

76…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.