Saldana-Velez
Saldana-Velez v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICARDO MANUEL SALDANA-VELEZ, No. 23-932 Agency No. Petitioner, A095-761-039 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 13, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Ricardo Saldana-Velez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks
review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion
to remand to seek cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). The BIA
declined to remand because Petitioner had failed to make a prima facie showing that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). he would be eligible for cancellation of removal. See Fonseca-Fonseca v. Garland,