Bondi

Olivas Asmat v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202524-3470California722 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 15 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUGO OLIVAS ASMAT; MASSIMO No. 24-3470

LUCCA OLIVAS DANERI; RITA

VICTORIA DANERI ROMERO; FAVIO Agency Nos.

OLIVAS DANERI, A246-778-909

A246-778-910

Petitioners, A246-778-911

A240-276-101

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals*

Submitted May 13, 2025 San Francisco, California**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Hugo Olivas Asmat, his wife Rita Victoria Daneri Romero, and their sons

Favio Olivas Daneri and Massimo Lucca Olivas Daneri (collectively, “petitioners”

or “the family”), all natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.