Kakenov

Kakenov v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202524-1062California1,319 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ULAN TOLOGONOVICH KAKENOV, No. 24-1062 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-953-676 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ulan Tologonovich Kakenov (Kakenov) seeks review of a Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming a decision by an Immigration

Judge (IJ) denying Kakenov’s motion to reopen his removal proceedings and

rescind his in absentia order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252, and we deny the petition.

In 2013, Kakenov applied for asylum. His asylum interview was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.