Bondi

Coto Delgado v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202524-607California853 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELENILSON A. COTO DELGADO, No. 24-607 Agency No. Petitioner, A029-212-247 v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: RAWLINSON, BUMATAY, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges

Petitioner Elenilson Armando Coto Delgado, a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of

his motion to reopen. Coto Delgado also challenges the BIA’s denial of his request

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 for an emergency stay of removal pending consideration of his motion to

reopen. The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion,

which is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.