Cortez
Cortez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202523-2268California780 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 15 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GRISELIA ESPERANZA No. 24-2922
CORTEZ; M.B.O.,
Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-886-694
A220-886-695
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 13, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Griselia Esperanza Cortez and her minor child petition for review
of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming an
Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.…