Cortez

Cortez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202523-2268California780 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 15 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRISELIA ESPERANZA No. 24-2922

CORTEZ; M.B.O.,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-886-694

A220-886-695

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Griselia Esperanza Cortez and her minor child petition for review

of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.