Dejoy

Chandler v. Dejoy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202524-1265California691 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN W. CHANDLER, No. 24-1265 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-00924-DWL v.

MEMORANDUM*

LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Former Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: RAWLINSON, BUMATAY, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff-Appellant John Chandler (“Chandler”) was employed as a City

Letter Carrier for Defendant-Appellee, the United States Postal Service

(“Defendant”). Defendant terminated Chandler’s employment in May…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.