People v. Carper CA4/1

facts. As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has identified two possible issues which were considered in the process of evaluating the potential merits of this appeal. 1. Was Carper sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement? 2. Whether the trial court erred in imposing a three-year term of probation. We have independently reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Carper on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

DO, J.

CASTILLO, J.

3