Alfredo Garibay v. FCI Lompoc II

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20252:24-cv-09367California1,426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ALFREDO GARIBAY, Case No. 2:24-cv-09367-SVW-SHK Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. FCI LOMPOC II, Respondent.

16 I. BACKGROUND On October 15, 2024,1 Petitioner Alfredo Garibay (“Petitioner”), an inmate of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ (“BOP”) Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) II in Lompoc, California (“FCI Lompoc”), proceeding pro se, constructively filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition” or “Pet.”). Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Pet. On February 17, 2025, Bryan Birkholz, Warden of FCI Lompoc (“Respondent”), moved to dismiss (“MTD”) the Petition. ECF No. 8, MTD. Petitioner failed to timely oppose the MTD. Therefore, on March 27, 2025, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause

1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.