Eaton

(PC) Roman v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20251:23-cv-00671California3,075 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISIDRO ROMAN, No. 1:23-cv-00671-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO AMEND BE DENIED K. JACKSON (ECF No. 42, 44, 45) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, filed March 13, 2025 and April 10, 2025, respectively. (ECF Nos. 42, 44.) On April 10, 2025, Plaintiff also submitted a proposed amended complaint which was lodged. (ECF No. 45.) I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendant K. Jackson. (ECF No. 22.) On October 14, 2024, Defendant file an answer to the complaint. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.