Mata

(PC) Luevano v. Mata

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20251:23-cv-01749California1,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DAVID LUEVANO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01749-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION AND MOTION FOR

v. EVIDENCE MATA, et al., (ECF Nos. 35, 36) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Daniel David Luevano (“Plaintiff”), a former state prisoner, proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeded against Defendants Mota1 and Navarro (“Defendants”) for their delayed response to the attack once it began on Plaintiff, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 28.) On February 25, 2025, Defendants filed a motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status on the ground that Plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)’s prisoner provision, but Plaintiff was no longer a prisoner. (ECF No. 29.) The Court stayed briefing on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.