Volzhenina

Volzhenina v. Safeco Insurance Company of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20254:24-cv-08002California2,585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VIKTORIYA VOLZHENINA, Case No. 24-cv-08002-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND AND TERMINATING

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 15 AMERICA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Viktoriya Volzhenina’s motion to remand, briefing for which is complete. Dkt. Nos. 15 (“Mot.”), 24 (“Opp.”), 16 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand. Dkt. No. 15. Accordingly, Defendant Mandy Esrock’s motion to dismiss is TERMINATED AS MOOT. Dkt. No. 5. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff owns real property in San Pablo, California insured by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company (“Safeco”). See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges that a fire in July 2023 damaged the property,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.