Salvador Venegas v. Stan Sniff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SALVADOR VENEGAS, Case No. 5:18-cv-02293-JLS-SHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART

v. THE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Defendants. JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), the record, and the Second Amended Report and Recommendation (“Second Amended R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Second Amended R&R to which Defendants and Plaintiff have objected. As set forth herein, the Court ACCEPTS IN PART the findings and recommendations set forth in the Second Amended R&R. Below, the Court first addresses the parties’ objections to the Second Amended R&R. Thereafter, the Court notes its disagreement with the conclusion reached by the Magistrate Judge as to the inapplicability of the Calfornia statutory incarcerated pretrial detainee. In the final section of this Order, the Court’s rulings are set forth.

I. PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO THE SECOND AMENDED R&R

HAVE NO MERIT

For the first time in his…