Scott Faulkner v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20255:25-cv-00473California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION SCOTT FAULKNER, ) Case No. 5:25-cv-00473-ODW-JDE ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. ) AND RECOMMENDATION OF ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE ) JUDGE ) Defendants. ) ) ) 17 Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the Civil Rights Complaint filed by Scott Faulkner (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. 1, “Complaint”), the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 4, “Report”), and the Objections to the Report filed by Plaintiff on May 5, 2025 (Dkt. 5, “Objections” or “Obj.”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. Among other recommended findings, the Magistrate Judge found Plaintiff failed to state a claim against Cpt. Flakes, Lt. Hyland, and Sgt. Rustad for failing to provide Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.