Gregory McKenna v. Panda Motors, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20258:25-cv-00193California1,671 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA S

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-00193-FWS-JDE Date: May 15, 2025 Title: Gregory McKenna v. Panda Motors, LLC Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDER [12]

On January 31, 2025, Petitioner Gregory McKenna (“Petitioner”) initiated this case against Respondent Panda Motors, LLC (“Respondent”) by filing a Petition to Modify or Vacate Arbitration Award. (Dkt. 1 (“Petition’”’).) That same day, Petitioner filed a Motion for Extension of Time, in which Petitioner stated that the Petition, which was due on January 13, 2025, “was not timely filed due to the United States Postal Service’s (USPS) loss of critical documents, including the Petition itself,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.