Redick III v. County of Tuolumne
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 STANLEY E. REDICK, III, Case No. 1:25-cv-00453-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, et al., (ECF NO. 1)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS
14 15 16 Plaintiff Stanley E. Redick, III proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action 17 filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 14). Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on March 21, 2025, 18 generally challenges Defendants’ alleged misconduct regarding his state court proceedings. (ECF 19 No. 1). 20 The Court screened the complaint on May 6, 2025, and concluded that Plaintiff failed to 21 state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 17). The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended 22 complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the screening order. (Id. at 12). Alternatively, the 23 Court gave Plaintiff the option of standing on his complaint, subject to the Court issuing findings 24…