C.R.
C.R. v. Elk Grove Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] C.R. by and through her Guardian ad Litem, No. 2:20-cv-02296-KJM-AC Tiffany Roe, ORDER B Plaintiff, v: Elk Grove Unified School District, et al., Defendants. 17 Elk Grove Unified School District and Marilyn Delgado, an employee, allege Capitol Elementary School has not lived up to its obligations under its “Master Contract” to provide 20 educational services. As explained in this order, the district and Delgado have cited undisputed evidence to show they are entitled to relief under their fourth and fifth crossclaims against the school. The school has an obligation to defend and indemnify the district and Delgado in this 23 action, and the school breached its obligation to obtain insurance. The court grants the pending 24 motion for partial summary judgment of these crossclaims (ECF No. 67).!
' The court resolves the motions at ECF Nos. 119, 120 and 138 in a separate and…