Ingram

(PC) Taylor v. Ingram

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20252:21-cv-01042California8,541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:21-01042 TLN SCR P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS MARSHA INGRAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is defendant Ingram’s motion for summary judgement on plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims. (ECF No. 58.) Ingram is the sole remaining defendant in the case. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion be granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1) Defendant’s motion be granted as to plaintiff’s claims premised on the alleged retaliatory Counseling Only Rules Violation Report and housing reassignment; and 2) Defendant’s motion be denied as to plaintiff’s claim premised on defendant’s alleged threat to reassign plaintiff’s housing assignment. //// //// //// BACKGROUND 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.