Moreno
(PC) Puckett v. Moreno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 2:22-cv-0650-JDP (P) Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER
D. MORENO, et al.,
15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that defendants Smith, Haynes, Williams, and Moreno violated his Eighth Amendment rights by refusing to acknowledge that he was suicidal. ECF No. 14 at 3. He also alleges that, in his suicidal state, he started a fire in his cell and defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to extricate him promptly. Id. at 3-4. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. ECF No. 81. Defendants also move for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff’s claims are contradicted by video evidence showing that defendants appropriately responded to plaintiff each time he started a fire in his cell. ECF No. 91. Defendants further claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity. Id. Additionally,
1 Defendants also moved for an extension of time to file their motion for summary judgment, ECF…