Dominisse
(PC) James v. Dominisse
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:24-cv-00448 DJC SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
PAMELA JEAN DOMINISSE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) for screening (ECF No. 18) and request for screening (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff’s request of screening is granted. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that plaintiff’s SAC fails to state a claim for relief and recommends the action be dismissed without leave to amend. STATUTORY SCREENING OF PRISONER COMPLAINTS The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In performing this screening function, the court must dismiss any claim…