Bondi

Tecun Hernandez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202522-75California584 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAX D J TECUN HERNANDEZ, No. 22-75 Agency No. Petitioner, A070-805-136 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Max De Jesus Tecun Hernandez, a native and citizen of

Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

dismissal of his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications

for cancellation of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”). “Where the BIA writes its own decision, as it did here, we review the

BIA’s decision,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.