Bondi

Castaneda Grajeda v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202523-228California609 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS DANIEL CASTANEDA No. 23-228 GRAJEDA, Agency No.

A205-315-476

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Daniel Castaneda Grajeda (“Castaneda”), a native and citizen of

Mexico, appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). application for cancellation of removal. As the parties are familiar with the facts,

we do not recount them…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.