Woods

Woods v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202524-1729California974 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD WOODS, No. 24-1729 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:22-cv-02019-PD v.

MEMORANDUM**

FRANK BISIGNANO,* Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Patricia A. Donahue, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2025*** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge R. NELSON.

After an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that jobs matching Ronald

* Frank Bisignano is substituted as Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Woods’ capabilities existed in substantial numbers in the national economy, the ALJ

denied Woods’ claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.