Swartz
United States v. Swartz
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1875 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00085-WHA-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 14, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Jesse Swartz was convicted of one count of assaulting a federal employee, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1). He appeals two employment-related conditions
of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court has broad discretion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) to
impose conditions…