Swartz

United States v. Swartz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202524-1875California692 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1875 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00085-WHA-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jesse Swartz was convicted of one count of assaulting a federal employee, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1). He appeals two employment-related conditions

of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court has broad discretion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) to

impose conditions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.