Ohm

United States v. Ohm

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202524-1497California448 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 16 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1497

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 8:21-cr-00123-DOC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

HECTOR OHM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Hector Ohm appeals his conviction on the ground that his guilty plea was

involuntary. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Based on the totality of the circumstances, United States v. Kaczynski, 239

F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th Cir. 2001), Ohm voluntarily entered his plea. Ohm expressed

his intent to plead guilty several times before the change-of-plea hearing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.