People of the State of California v. Rish Investments, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202524-4283California571 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAY 16 2025
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF No. 24-4283 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
CALIFORNIA,
D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:24-cv-03276-CBM-MRW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RISH INVESTMENTS, INC., a California corporation,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
GAZI MONIRUL ISLAM,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 12, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rish Investments, Inc. (Rish) appeals from the district court’s order
remanding the case to state court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).
We affirm.
Rish cannot show that an exception applies to the well-pleaded complaint
rule for federal question jurisdiction. See County of…